News Article Comments : Health minister hits back at trade

48 Posts(s) found for this thread: Now displaying page 5 of 5

  • Search forums
Morning Advertiser Forums
Author Name Opinion Reply

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

'Thank you Robert for denouncing cheaters and poll riggers from TBD

site. You are a well respected leader of opnion from that site so I do

expect guidance from you regarding cheating. The thread is continuing

so a short reminder about lying and cheating would put a stop to that.' 'Robert, You are a poor poor leader and you are letting your dwindling numbers down.' Make up your mind Jon in two different following posts you make the above observations. Which one is it Jon, a 'well respected leader' or 'a poor poor leader'. More typical ASHITE responses if all else fails insult. Oh and by the way the numbers are actually growing, but we know maths is not your strong point so I'll let it pass.

This post replies to Jon Singleton > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

What have ghosts got to do with Smoking. Tha'ts where your link took me to a front page.

This post replies to Jon Singleton > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

I have checked out re PeteJ and there is nothing sinister in what he has done. He has a wife who shares his views and legitimately voted twice. So Jon, or is it Ron, or Tim, nice try but wrong again.

This post replies to Jon Singleton > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

The link was the one given by Pete. Maybe they have pulled the poll already.

Good to see how proud Pete is about his wife's legititimate vote that he has chosen to cryptically announce it on such a thread. I am afraid that his excuse does not wash.

No idea who Ron or Tim are. You have wet my appetite now, I will have a look at their posts.

However, your post on the 'how to cheat' thread is a great Xmas tonic, thank you.

This post replies to Robert Feal-Martinez > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

Jon,

 

What page are you up to exactly in the Anti Smoking Hate group bible?

 

You seem to be on page 2, 'Don't venture into meaningful debate or discuss the science; make personal attacks and use every means to discredit the opposition'.

 

Trouble is Jon you can't use the big bad tobacco puppet slur like it tells you on that page so you need to find a comment on a general, unmoderated public board, read more into it and then try to discredit everyone in the organisation. Doesn't quite have the same impact. By the way how is the nicotine replacement therapy stock doing at the moment for your drug companies?

 

It really is very amuzing to watch and of course it's a wonderful insight for readers into the ways of ash. Keep it up :)

 

This post replies to Jon Singleton > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

Mr Kerr unfortunatly does not care about business, if there was the option of Smoking and Non Smoking outlets then all would be happy, for those that were concerned about tobacco smoke then they have places to socialise and for those (The majority) who did not have a problem with it then they too would all have a place to socialise, listen to the people Mr Kerr, you said that droves of Non Smokers were going to fill the Pubs in Scotland but we all knew this was not going to happen.

This post replies to this thread

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

Mr Kerr unfortunatly does not care about business,

He's told you that already ..

"However Kerr hit back saying: "There's a brutal answer to that. This is about public health, it's about saving lives - it's not about businesses.”

This post replies to Alastair Elliott > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

RE: Health minister hits back at trade

Mr Kerr unfortunatly does not care about business,

He's told you that already ..

"However Kerr hit back saying: "There's a brutal answer to that. This is about public health, it's about saving lives - it's not about businesses.”

But he's lying;

 

If it were anything to do with health he would have backed an indoor air quality policy to remove some of the over 400 known carcinogens floating about that have nothing to do with smoke instead of banning a minor irritant that has been shown by the more than 150 research papers into passive smoke to be less harmful than olive oil and coffee. It gives a very different message when all the facts are presented don't you think Jon?

This post replies to Jon Singleton > RE: Health minister hits back at trade

 

© William Reed Business Media Ltd 2008. All rights reserved. William Reed Business Media Ltd. Registered Office: Broadfield Park, Crawley RH11 9RT. Registered in England No. 2883992. VAT No. 644 3073 52.