News Article Comments : Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

95 Posts(s) found for this thread: Now displaying page 10 of 10

  • Search forums
Morning Advertiser Forums
Author Name Opinion Reply

RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

Beaupere. Here is another: The longer the duration of exposure to asbestos, and the higher the concentration of asbestos fibres in the air, the greater the likelihood that persons shall develop a fibrotic lung disease. There must be others!

This post replies to Ken Nason > RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

 

RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

JM, and what length of exposure would be safe to a non hazzardous or non toxic substance?

 

Ken Nason

This post replies to J Macrae > RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

 

RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

Beaupere. To enable me to answer your question fully. I need to understand your unusual use of the Latin word "non" used as a prefix in this context. I say this because a hazard is a hazard if identified as a hazard. Perhaps, you could at your convenience consider phrasing the question again using the word "not". In passing, do you fancy a day in the Park tomorrow.

This post replies to Ken Nason > RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

 

RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

The longer the duration of exposure to asbestos, and the higher the concentration of asbestos fibres in the air...,

Are you sure about that JM? I think you will find that asbestos is pretty harmless until it is broken up which is when the fibres start getting into the air. As asbestos was used as insulation Plumbers are likely to have been exposed to high levels of the fibre.

But perhaps equally so would most people over about 35 that lived in a built up area or near any breaking zone on the road as asbestos was used as brake lining material. 

This post replies to J Macrae > RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

 

RE: Smoking ban - "exclude bingo and clubs"

And Young Macrae said : "Provided that it is not the result of confounding [factors]"

 

And Several Others Did Not Reply: "We didn't quite notice that bit of your argument, but we wish we had and, clearly, we should have"

 

For, verily, it was the Weak Link in the Logic.

-----------------------------------------------

For the record, JM, I  am  suggesting everything you think/hope/suggest I might be suggesting.

 

 But only to please you.

This post replies to this thread

 

© William Reed Business Media Ltd 2008. All rights reserved. William Reed Business Media Ltd. Registered Office: Broadfield Park, Crawley RH11 9RT. Registered in England No. 2883992. VAT No. 644 3073 52.