Michael Kheng 26/05/2008 11:44:53 ![]() |
RE: Supermarkets slash prices to rock bottom levels > RE: Supermarkets slash prices to rock bottom levels
What is very interesting is that if we started to sell a pint of anything below £1 and took out adverts in the national press and on TV then the police would soon be applying for a review of our Premises Licence. As I have stated many many times we all sell alcohol in a controlled environment. Supermarkets do not, but they never seem to have their licences reviewed. Is this a level playing field? Someone should take stcok of the situation and start to address the supermarkets. Until they are hauled into line the problems that we have with alcohol shall continue. Michael Kheng - kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 24/05/2008 10:25:30 ![]() |
RE: Supermarkets slash prices to rock bottom levels > RE: Supermarkets slash prices to rock bottom levels
Mark, As an independent free of tie operator my comments were to free of tie operators and not intentionally directed at those who are tied for packaged beers. I would not not want to encourage anyone to break the terms of any lease agreements. Maybe you could tell your pub co to go and buy their Becks from Tescos and pass on some savings as I would bet they are maybe also paying a higher price than the general public. Come the revolution when Gordon quits/is fired/is voted out, the next government hopefully will see what is happening to this fine country and our great industry and do something positive for once. Michael Kheng - kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 23/05/2008 21:19:47 ![]() |
Supermarkets slash prices to rock bottom levels > RE: Supermarkets slash prices to rock bottom levels
I think the offer on Becks is absolutely brilliant. I have sent one of our employees to all the local Tesco’s to buy up all their Becks. The true cost is not 40p a bottle but 34p a bottle as the Tesco price includes VAT. This is a huge saving on what I thought was already a keen price I had negotiated for our company. It is very interesting to do the sums on this one. 40 x 275 ml bottle for £16.00 = £13.617 ex VAT. 40 x 275 ml = 11 litres = 19.34 pints. £13.617 / 19.34 = 70.4p a pint. The Excise Duty on a pint of 5% beer = 42.5p. This leaves 27.9p. Who are Tesco’s trying to fool. Can they prove that they are really buying Becks at 27.9p a pint? I don’t think so. When Gordon finally is toppled I hope the next Government wake up and see that it is the super mark ets that are creating the problems with alcohol and not the easy target, well run, well managed, pubs. I urge everyone to stock up on Becks from Tesco’s. If we can benefit by legally buying premium products at knock down prices then let’s go for it. At least it will prevent to consumers from buying it if we have already cleared the shelves. Michael Kheng FBII - kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 15/04/2008 08:03:05 ![]() |
Pubs not supersizing wine offer > RE: Pubs not supersizing wine offer
Yet again the media frenzy against the industry takes hold. What's needs to be highlighted is the fact that if wine is sold by the bottle then what does the size of the glass matter? Will we soon be told that we must start serving beer in halfs and not pints? Are there really that many people out there abusing alcohol by drinking wine? Funny, nothing mentioned about the giant Tesco selling 75cl wine glasses for people to take home and dink a bottle of wine in one glass!! Michael Kheng FBII - kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 25/03/2008 08:01:19 ![]() |
Scots consider raising drinking age to 21 > RE: Scots consider raising drinking age to 21
What they should be concidering (England and Wales also) is to introduce a ban on sales to under 21's in the Off Trade only. It's the Off Trade that causes most of the damage so for once why don't the govenerment look at them. Michael Kheng www.kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 25/03/2008 07:58:30 ![]() |
Off-trade ignores anti-binge budget > RE: Off-trade ignores anti-binge budget
Why is it that the trade predicted that the Off Trade trade would ignor any increases and that only the On Trade and the Off Trade customers would suffer. One day the government will enter into the world of reality and start listening to what is said and reading what is presented. Michael Kheng - www.kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 22/03/2008 13:53:37 ![]() |
variation of premise licence fees > RE: variation of premise licence fees
Hi Derek If the figure includes VAT then it's still c£2,500!! Total rip off I would say. Most applications which we deal with cost in the region of £1,000. You should find out how much the application was (this can easily be calculated once you have the rateable value), and how much the newspaper advert cost. You will them see how much they have loaded the fees to you. There may also be some architects fees for the plans but I'm assuming that as the application was a variation you already had some plans. Also you mention that a resident complained. Did this mean the application went before the Licensing Sub-Committee? If so then the legal fees could rise as a result of the hearing. I think you need to ask for a full breakdown so you can see how the £2,500 is made up. There is nothing to prevent you from applying for a Premises Licence (although you would have to check your Lease to see if this is possible) or even you to make the application and have the new licence in the name of the Landlord. Michael Kheng Licensing Consultant - www.kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 12/03/2008 20:33:18 ![]() |
RE: Tim Martin: trade can only blame itself > RE: Tim Martin: trade can only blame itself
Can anyone tell me if I've got it all wrong.... Chris, quite right. On higher ABVs the increase will be higher. Will any of the national press pick up on this? They have not in the past so no reason why they should now. Mr Daily Mail reader will be in next week expecting a 4p rise and anything above will trigger another Daily Mail anti pub campaign. Maybe we should produce an explaination poster which illustrates that 4p is not 4p and is fact a lot lot more than 4p. I think if I was in Camerons shoes it's a statement I would make, although if Cameron made such a statement come the revolution when the Conservatives get back in it will only come back and haunt them when their chancellor does the same. Michael Kheng FBII - kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 12/03/2008 20:27:22 ![]() |
Tim Martin: trade can only blame itself > RE: Tim Martin: trade can only blame itself
I normally respect others in the trade but sorry Tim you have to be the execption. If you discount drinks then you and you alone are partly to blame for this. Don't try and say that the collective trade is responsible. Some of us, in fact most of us, operate very good establishments, with high standards and selling alcohol in a responsible maner at non discounted prices. Some of us also tried to fight any rises, did you? Michael Kheng FBII - kurnia.co.uk |
Michael Kheng 12/03/2008 20:19:04 ![]() |
Darling hammers the pub > RE: Darling hammers the pub
A big WELL DONE to new labour! Once again let's send out a message that we are doing something about the problems surrounding binge drinking, or at least let's send out any single that we can say will combat binge drinking. In 12 months time when pubs have closed due to increases in costs and the good old return of the 'booze cruise' what will new Labour say then? Nothing I guess as they will be using another smoke screen somewhere else. It seems to me that Mr ASDA and Mr Tesco have something going with our 'Darling' chancellor. Maybe it's something along the lines of 'Look Darling we make so much profit that we have to pay the government lot's of tax. If you do anything to affect our trade then the government will lose out. Make a statement that hits the pubs, not us'. All this budget is going to do is to encourage more to buy that cheap alcohol before coming out, thus encouraging bindge drinking and leaving the trade. yet again, to clean up the mess when after drinking the cheap alcohol they try and enter our controlled, properly run establishments, only for us, the responsible operators, to refuse service t them and turn them away. Bring in a law that prevents anyone under 21 being able to purchase alcohol in the off trade is what I say. Tackle the problem in the correct manner. I would love to have Darling and Brown visit a town where we have an outlet so they can see what it's actually like in the real world. I often feel they live in some sort of magic bubble in the City. They sure as hell cannot be in touch with the real world. They don't listen to, or read, what is presented to them, unless that is your name is Mr Tesco or Mr ASDA or similar. As if the industry was not already having problems. I wonder what will be proposed next? Michael Kheng FBII - kurnia.co.uk |