News Article Comments : Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

51 Posts(s) found for this thread: Now displaying page 1 of 6

  • Search forums
Morning Advertiser Forums
Author Name Opinion Reply

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Off thread but taken from the Herald regarding prescribing NRP to children

Professor David Marks, London, UK

In the opinion of many independent nicotine researchers, the Committee on the Safety of Medicines has got its new advice on NRT dramatically wrong. In approving NRT use in 12 to 18-year-olds and also pregnant women, the Committee has been influenced by people and organisations who have pro-NRT biases. These biases have been fed by gifts in money and in kind from the companies which manufacture and distribute NRT products. The use of such "experts" in forming important clinical decisions is morally wrong and should be illegal. Scotland's family doctors will be appropriately cautious about prescribing a drug that is a poison and carries many potential dangers to the foetus and adolescent smokers. There are many effective ways to help people to quit which are perfectly safe. It is shocking that tobacco researchers who have received funding from the industry and who know that NRT is hardly better than a placebo feel no sense of shame about their conduct. Thankfully, GPs in Scotland will make up their own minds about the safety and risks of NRT in light of the pitfalls of industry sponsored advice.

At last a professional speaks out....

 

This post replies to this thread

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

This from Bill's post needs highlighting: There are many effective ways to help people to quit which are

perfectly safe. It is shocking that tobacco researchers who have

received funding from the industry and who know that NRT is hardly

better than a placebo feel no sense of shame about their conduct.  Will ASH feel a sense of shame, will Deborah Arnott, Amanda Sandford, Ian Willmore feel a sense of shame, that doctors are concerned about political interence into clinical issues, putting unborn babies and teenagers at risk. Of course not they openly promote drugs that kill. With his brain washed by state propaganda and misinformation Nick Hirst,

18, was convinced that smoking kills, and that it would decrease his

athletic performance and – who knows – perhaps even his performance with

girls. As so many other victims do, Nick ran to the drug store to buy Zyban

– so much recommended even by the ministry of health – to “cure” smoking,

the disease that does not exist. And indeed Zyban may even deliver: it may

make you quit -- one way or another . Hit by a powerful depression,

Nick stayed off cigarettes, as he was truly convinced that smoking kills .

Everybody says so: maybe even his doctor, some of his friends who have been

already brainwashed – and, who knows, even his ant, who heard some

pharmaceutical stooge quoting mortality statistics on the radio. Nick hung

himself to a tree in a park. The investigation is now conclusive: it was

Zyban-induced depression -- although one must not forget to blame alcohol

and an obsessive personality as well, in spite of the fact that they never existed

before taking Zyban, and no indications of suicidal tendency was given.

We have to keep in

mind that there are concomitant causes,

This post replies to Bill Gibson > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This post replies to this thread

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Thats better. Bob, Bill.

Why?

This post replies to this thread

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

And don't let ASH tell you differently This from their website: Zyban (Bupropion Hydrochloride)

Zyban is a treatment which changes the way that your body responds to

nicotine. You start taking Zyban a couple of weeks before you quit

and then continue the treatment for a few weeks to help you through

the withdrawal cravings. It's only available on prescription and is

not available if you are pregnant. Champix

A new stop smoking treatment called Champix is now available on

prescription and guidance on its use is expected from NICE, the

organisation that assesses new treatments, in July 2007.

Champix has already been shown to have more severe side effects than Zyban which is known to have killed dozens of people, either directly or indirectly and yet ASH openly endorse their use. ASH are the piriars of death. They claim to want to rid the world of the harm from tobacco but promote death from drugs containing tobacco products. This is what the SMC wrote about Champix in Januanry this year. Efficacy and safety in patients with significant co-morbidity are uncertain. The general advice from the SMC's to doctors, is, it's up to you.?

This post replies to Robert Feal-Martinez > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Is this relevant to the thread?

I think not. The awareness of the ban is an important issue to licencees as the day looms large.

Posts about side effects of NRT are another argument and it may be argued for a totally different forum.

The news on the street, Bob, is the world will not end if you don't post on every smoking related article. Quality, not quantity.

This post replies to Robert Feal-Martinez > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Gilbert...unless you have stopped watching TV, Smoking Cessation is covered by TV Advertising therefore there is every need to provide  the wider picture.

This post replies to Gilbert Bank > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

The quality is imparting the truth not the social engineered lies of the anti smoking movement and their supporters. Why should I not post ASH etal believe they have the right to contact licensees about snuff, have the right to dictate to drug co's who they employ, the right to threaten employers with legal action etc. When they have no such right under their Charitable Status. As it happens further complaints have gone to the Charities Commission. ASH as a Limited Company are trading Insolvent according to their posted accounts, another breach of CC rules. Their donations are servicing debt not research and education.

This post replies to Gilbert Bank > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Good God, Robert,

Where do you find your stuff?

" The investigation is now conclusive: it was Zyban-induced depression -- although one must not forget to blame alcohol and an obsessive personality as well,"

Not to forget the alcohol and obsessive personality !!!

Not to forget it has nothing to do with smoking ads !!

This post replies to Robert Feal-Martinez > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

Too true, Gilbert

Going back to the article,

Only 50 days to go. Excellent stuff.

Still no glimpse of a JR, either.

Lots of links to far away places and cut and pastes from unonnected web pages though.

That should keep a lot of people happy.

This post replies to Gilbert Bank > RE: Smoking ban ads to boost awareness

 

© William Reed Business Media Ltd 2008. All rights reserved. William Reed Business Media Ltd. Registered Office: Broadfield Park, Crawley RH11 9RT. Registered in England No. 2883992. VAT No. 644 3073 52.