Alan Thompson 25/07/2008 11:13:07 ![]() |
Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace > Glasgow by election
Hamish seemed to be more hopeful about the Glasgow by election - 'at least they've got proper political parties there' he said. He received 65 votes from an electorate of around 62,000 |
Alan Thompson 15/07/2008 11:12:30 ![]() |
Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace > Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace
Claiming that this loon who got 8 votes is a barometer of support for anything has to be the most feeble attempt yet from F2C to explain why there is so little support for overturning the ban. Can you REALLY not do any better. To come back to the point I made at the start of the thread - all the evidence points to there only being a TINY proportion of the smoking population of 15 million actually being bothered enough about it to vote. There are not 15 million angry smokers out there, it looks like there are 70,000 angry smokers and 14,930,000 smokers who are happy, indifferent, or apathetic about the ban. And before you say it, nobody in their right mind would expect these 14,930,000 people to turn out and vote for Tony Farnon (except perhaps F2C as a means of diverting attention away from Hamish and his 91 votes) |
Alan Thompson 14/07/2008 16:22:13 ![]() |
Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace > Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace
So why only 91 votes? |
Alan Thompson 14/07/2008 12:24:10 ![]() |
Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace > Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace
I waited for the spin, it took a lot longer and then it came. It wasn't very good. Tony Parsons doesn't seem to be anti-smoking - he looks like someone trying to sell something, possibly a stop smoking system, but his website doesn't work. His statement was "I believe that everyone should have the opportunity of living and developing in freedom as long as they do not injure the freedom of others. State control should be limited to promoting this ideal through all its points of contact with society, especially in the educational, legal and financial systems." Hamish's statement " my politics are i'm old Labour i see new Labour as new Tory, i see the three main parties completely out of touch with the people. luvvie dovies pampering to the politicaly correct. the smoking ban is one example of many a law of oppression that creates apathy and social exclusion for the working classes and under classes. the traditional british independent pub as we know it will be a museum piece. a pub is a hub of political and social debate not parliament or the lords. The elderly and handicapped are to frightened and proud to be paraded like animals in a zoo outside what once were the best pubs in the world. I'm fighting to save the pub and give choice." And the best spin anyone can come up with was a vote for Parsons was a vote against smoking. And he didn't get many so people must love smoking. Feeble. You surely can do beter than that. Where were all the angry smokers who hate the ban? Alan |
Alan Thompson 11/07/2008 20:12:58 ![]() |
RE: Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace > RE: Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace
"Alan,,,are you then saying,that people should NOT HAVE A CHOICE?." I thought my point was perfectly clear. It wasn't about choice, it was about the tiny amount of support that exists to amend the ban. Alan |
Alan Thompson 11/07/2008 14:41:57 ![]() |
Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace > RE: Smoke ban rebel: Byelection a disgrace
Terry Hamish received 91 votes out of an electorate of 70,264. If you scale that up to the English population of 50 million, it equates to 65,000 people who would be behind him. The rest of the 15 million you talk about don't seem to be that bothered. Before anyone comes out with the 'smokers are afraid/too lazy/too apathetic to vote' argument, remember he was beaten by 5 independents plus the New Party, Monster Raving Looney Party, Miss Great Britain Party, National Front, English Democrats and the Green Party as well as David Davis. He polled only 3 times as many votes as the bloke who was trying to get no votes at all. I keep saying that the people on here who think there is massive opposition to the ban are deluding themselves, and here is another example of just how little opposition there is. I look forward to the F2C spin and associated insults. Alan |
Alan Thompson 30/06/2008 19:13:30 ![]() |
RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down > RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down
Funny that, when I rang our local HSE office and asked them they gave the explanation I gave above, which isn't the F2C interpretation. Perhaps you caught them on a bad day. |
Alan Thompson 30/06/2008 16:30:12 ![]() |
RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down > RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down
Colin So you agree the F2C interpretation of the HSE document is a wild misrepresentation? Alan |
Alan Thompson 28/06/2008 16:23:57 ![]() |
RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down > RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down
bill "more interested in fact than fiction !!!" Then why do you and your F2C mates continue with the misrepresentation of what the HSE said? They never said there was no risk. They never said there was no evidence of risk. They did say it would be difficult for an inspector to evidence the risk of a particular individual developing a particular disease from the exposure to smoke in their particular workplace and to take court action based on that evidence. They didn't say to inspectors 'take no action', they advised them to get specialist advice if they were considering taking enforcement action in a particular workplace. You and your fellow conspiracy theorists have turned fact into fiction where this particular document is concerned. Why don't you ask someone entirely independent of your circle of conspiracy theorists to read it and tell you what they think it says? You won't like what they say. Alan |
Alan Thompson 28/06/2008 10:26:40 ![]() |
RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down > RE: Smoke ban gets trade thumbs down
Bill Meanwhile in the Henley by election, only about 850 people voted for the UKIP candidate. UKIP are the only party who have said they would amend the smoking ban. There are 69,000 voters in the constituency Even Labour beat them! Alan |