Mulholland seeks free-of-tie name change

By Adam Pescod

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags Call option Punch taverns

Greg Mulholland: Seeking clarification from Punch over its free-of-tie proposal
Greg Mulholland: Seeking clarification from Punch over its free-of-tie proposal
Greg Mulholland, MP, has written to Punch Taverns managing director Roger Whiteside, calling on the company to rename its free-of-tie options.

Liberal Democrat pub campaigner Greg Mulholland, MP, has written to Punch Taverns managing director Roger Whiteside, calling on the company to clarify their free-of-tie offer.

He has expressed concerns with the wording of Punch Taverns' free of tie proposal, which he claims is not a genuine free-of-tie lease. He believes this could "mislead" and "misrepresent" the option to both licensees, MPs and ministers. He has made the calls in the days before the Business, Innovation & Skills Committee's (BISC) follow-up inquiry into the beer-tie kicks off on Thursday.

Mulholland said the free-of-tie option simply allows tenants to buy from a different price list, and is not free-of-tie. He has called on Punch to rename these agreements to ensure transparency and clarity of their free-of-tie options.

In his letter to Whiteside, Mulholland asked for clarity on how the level of discount is established and whether it will be adjusted to reflect changes in the discount to free of tie operators over time.

Mullholland said: "The recent Save the Pub Group meeting very helpfully helped establish that no pub company is offering a genuine free of tie option with open market rent review.

"Punch Taverns have been involved in a lot of PR and lobbying, but I am extremely concerned that the information they are sending out, both to tenants and MPs is seriously and deliberately misleading.

"To describe a lease option as 'free-of-tie pricing' when it is nothing of the sort, is wholly dishonest and unacceptable and could be perceived as an attempt to dupe MPs and tenants into thinking they have done what the Select Committee said they must do, when they have not.

"Punch and the other companies can, of course, tell the Select Committee that believe they have changed and improved how they operate; but they must not try to suggest they have complied with what the Committee said they must do to avoid intervention, when they have already confirmed publicly that they have not and are actually not able to do so due to the structuring of their business model".

Punch has responded claiming its options are transparent.

A spokeman said: "Punch is completely transparent in the range of pricing alternatives that we offer to our Partners. We give all of our Partners the entirely transparent option of choosing lower prices for beer and cider as a way of lowering their variable costs. Whilst some have chosen this equivalent to 'free of tie pricing' option, in the current economic climate the vast majority of our Partners choose the security of a lower rent level instead. Giving our Partners the clear freedom to choose is at the heart of our goal of becoming the most trusted pub company in the UK. All of our pricing options are set out clearly in our Code of Practice, which is available on our website.

"Openness and transparency are at the heart of everything that we do at Punch. We have always made clear that we do not favour the destruction of the tied model, and that 'free of tie pricing' is just one of the many pricing options to our Partners."

Related topics Legislation

Property of the week

Follow us

Pub Trade Guides

View more