MPs say new pub closure figures show planning loopholes must be closed

By James Wallin contact

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Local government, Planning permission, Demolition

Greg Mulholland has called for the Government to do more to protect pubs
Greg Mulholland has called for the Government to do more to protect pubs
MPs across the political divide have called for the Government to close a loophole that allows pubs to demolished or converted without planning permission.

The pleas from members of the All Party Parliamentary Save the Pub Group came after figures compiled by the Campaign for Real Ale and CGA Strategy showed the weekly pub closure rate had risen from 28 to 31.

The group’s chair, Lib Dem MP Greg Mulholland, said:  “It is not right that pubs, so often the heart of a community, can be converted into supermarkets or offices without developers needing planning permission. It is very welcome that the Government has now accepted that any new betting shops need to get planning permission, but why the blind spot when it comes to all the fundamental changes that lead to the loss of a pub or the establishment of a new supermarket? Both should require planning permission and the right for communities to have a say.

“I have raised many times with communities and local government ministers about the clear lack of real protection for local services, including pubs. Their response is always ACVs, that local authorities should use Article 4 Directions and consider compulsory purchase. We keep going around in circles. They fail to address the fundamental and obvious point - that the permitted development rights are clearly absurd and indefensible and are often denying communities ANY say over many local assets and services. This is not something that anyone who claims to support community empowerment and localism can defend.


“Communities must be given a say in proposed changes to much-valued local facilities. Ministers need to wake up to the predatory purchasing of valued local pubs by Tesco, as well as indebted pubcos looking to offload pubs behind the backs of communities who use them. If ministers really value pubs as they claim, they must stop having a blind spot towards pubs and urgently look at changing the existing planning laws.”

Vice-Chair of the Save the Pub group, Conservative MP Caroline Nokes, said: "Pubs are really important to local communities, but at the moment it is much too easy for them to be converted into other things like supermarkets without local people having any say. That isn't right, and localism means that any conversion or demolition of a pub must go through the planning process so people can object."

Tom Stainer, head of communications for CAMRA, urged those with concerns about pub closures to sign up to the group’s Pubs Matter campaign.

He added: “Popular and profitable pubs are being left vulnerable by gaps in English planning legislation as pubs are increasingly being targeted by those wishing to take advantage of the absence of proper planning control. It is utterly perverse that developers are able to demolish or convert a pub into a convenience store or many other uses without any requirement to apply for planning permission.

“A pub is an entirely different proposition to a convenience store, estate agent or funeral directors and the planning system needs updating to reflect this fact. It is wrong that communities are left powerless when a popular local pub is threatened with demolition or conversion into a Tesco store.”

Related topics: Property law

Related news

Show more


Show more

Of course it's similar.

Posted by david,

Of course it's "similar" when you've completely invented a motive for the lord's actions to fit your reasoning.

As you have no idea what motivation lies behind the lord's action, any similarity is purely contrived in your mind.

It seems someone who actually knows the man sees his actions in a rather kinder light:

"This pub is 2 miles from where I live. Lord Francis Phillimore owns a lot of farms this way and is very good to the community round this way. He treats his staff very well. One of the good guys. I hope the pub does well".

Report abuse

Altruism ??

Posted by RFM,

I doubt it, probably didn't want any houses built.

We had a similar thing, our neighbour to the pub paid well over the odds for a piece of waste ground at an auction because the only other bidders were travellers. He was protecting his and frankly every ones properties.

Report abuse

Lord above

Posted by david,

Seems like every community could do with a lord . . . .

Report abuse

Follow us

Pub Trade Guides

View more


Subscribe to The Morning Advertiser

The definitive voice for the pub trade

Get the latest news, analysis and insights from the uk pub sector straight to your inbox!

Featured Events

View more

Listen to The MA Podcast