Exclusive research

New allergen laws: Majority of licensees think EU legislation 'unnecessary'

By Mike Berry contact

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: New rules, Allergen information, Allergen, Morning advertiser

Only a third of licensees say they are able to name the 14 allergens covered by the legislation
Only a third of licensees say they are able to name the 14 allergens covered by the legislation
Ahead of the new EU rules on displaying allergen information that come into force in two days’ time (13 December), just one third of licensees say that they are able to name the 14 allergens covered by the legislation.

Under the new Food Information for Consumers Regulation, pubs will need to provide information on any of the 14 allergens used as ingredients for food and drink. It means publicans must tell customers who ask, either in writing or verbally, whether a menu item contains traces of any of the named allergens.

However, an exclusive survey of Publican’s Morning Advertiser​ readers found only 32% of licensees said they could name all of the allergens, with the same percentage stating that they possibly could.

The 14 allergenic ingredients which will be covered by the new legislation are: celery, crustaceans, eggs, fish, gluten, lupin, milk, molluscs, mustard, nuts, peanuts, sesame seeds, soya and sulphur dioxide.


Operators who fail to provide the correct information could face unlimited fines, but almost four in 10 (38%) licensees were unaware of the penalties for lack of compliance. It is hoped that trading standards enforcement activity will be light-touch as pub retailers get to grips with the legislation.

The survey paints a picture of a trade unconvinced about the need for the new rules. More than half of respondents (57%) said they were ‘hardly ever’ asked by customers about allergen information and almost two-thirds (64%) deemed the new legislation unnecessary.

While not overly concerned about the impact of the new rules on their pub — just one-fifth said they are ‘worried’ or ‘very worried’ — one in 10 admitted to being not at all prepared for this weekend’s introduction.

In terms of business preparation, six in 10 had undertaken extra staff training, with employees verbally explaining allergens to customers named as the top choice when asked what actions they had put in place to help with compliance.

Other popular options included allergen statements on menus and an allergen sheet given to customers. One fifth of respondents have designed and printed a separate allergen menu.


Allergy charities have welcomed the new rules, claiming they will provide more certainty for sufferers in managing their condition when eating out. Research also shows that allergy sufferers, and those with whom they eat out, are worth hundreds of millions of pounds a year to venues willing to provide allergen-free dishes.

Despite this, overall, more than three-quarters (77%) of licensees didn’t think the legislation was a positive move for the trade.

The online poll was completed by a self-selecting sample of 256 licensees.

For advice and top tips on the new rules visit our allergen hot topic page.

Related topics: Licensing law

Related news

Show more


Farewell Common Sense

Posted by Matt Gorton,

If you have one of these ridiculous allergies, why not just ask what's in a dish? Where were these allergies in The Warsaw Ghetto - imagine it, 'I'm starving but I can't eat that thin potato soup you give me once a week as they may have put some celery in it' Celery for goodness sake, isn't that about 99% water? As this is another daft EU nonsense, I look forward to my next trip to Spain to see if our favourite beach shack restaurant is adhering, backed by the might of the Spanish equivalent of our EHO and elf'n'safety industry. I thimk not..

Report abuse


Posted by geo halliday,

Another job creation scheme implemented at the busiest time of the year. As most kitchens are multi-use environments you still cannot guarantee an allergen is not in a food. Look at the wrappers. Most already say things like "may contain due to the production environment". And where have all these allergies come from? No one had them when I was a kid.

Report abuse


Posted by martin clarkson,

Obviously set up by some one who doesn't or has never worked in the industry! Otherwise why would they have chosen the middle of DECEMBER TO bring it into law!! Clever planning! other than that not really a problem just another nanny state rule!

Report abuse