However, several campaigns have highlighted how quickly a creative idea can become a PR nightmare.
Scottish brewer and pub operator BrewDog in particular has had a notably turbulent year.
Join our new WhatsApp channel: The Morning Round-Up
Get the biggest pub trade stories straight to your phone. Listen to our one-minute daily news briefing and receive breaking news, exclusives and sector updates throughout the day. Remember to turn notifications on in the top right corner! Join the channel here.
The company withdrew its “Tastes like commercial suicide” campaign for Punk IPA in December 2025 after facing criticism from suicide prevention charities, which argued the slogan trivialised a serious issue.
While intended as a reference to the cost of reformulating its flagship beer, the campaign sparked widespread backlash before the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) reached a formal ruling.
Though that wasn’t BrewDog’s only run-in with the regulator. The ASA also banned an advert for its Wingman beer after deciding it implied alcohol could help people deal with boredom, loneliness and frustration, breaching the rules around alcohol advertising.
More recently, competitive socialising operator Golf Fang also found itself in hot water last month after distributing promotional leaflets designed to look like parking tickets.
Widespread attention
The stunt generated widespread attention, but the ASA ruled recipients were likely to believe they had received a genuine penalty notice before realising it was an advert, making the campaign misleading.
Going back to 2022, Stonegate, the UK’s biggest pubco, was investigated by the ASA for social media posts that were found to encourage excessive drinking and featured people who appeared under 25 years of age.
At the same time, Edinburgh-based City Clubs venue the Hive Nightclub also came under fire by the ASA for social media posts, as did Montpeliers Nightclub, also in the Scottish capital.
However, it’s not just operators that have faced scrutiny, a number of alcohol producers have also been in the spotlight.
In September last year, Heineken UK’s Strongbow cider had an influencer campaign banned after the ASA ruled it suggested drinking was more appealing than meeting responsibilities.
Jägermeister also faced action over social media content that the regulator found encouraged irresponsible drinking.
Elsewhere, the Portman Group’s Independent Complaints Panel (ICP) has continued to examine branding and packaging.
Closer attention
Little Mesters Brewery was required to withdraw its Stan IPA in January 2025 after the panel ruled its knife-shaped pump clip and branding could link alcohol with violent behaviour.
Sussex-based Beak Brewery also withdrew one of its beers in 2024 following concerns raised by the ICP about branding that could associate alcohol with violence.
More recently, in June this year, complaints against Cactus Jack’s schnapps were upheld over packaging that breached the industry’s Code of Practice.
This comes as the debate around alcohol marketing gathers pace, with a YouGov poll published in July last year finding 65% of Britons supported a ban on alcohol advertising on television before the 9pm watershed.
While there is currently no proposal to introduce such a ban, the findings suggested public attitudes towards alcohol advertising have shifted.
As operators and producers battle tough trading conditions, bold marketing is key to standing out.
But with regulators paying closer attention to everything from social media posts to pump clips and product names, knowing where the line is has never been more important.
