ICP conclude Babe Wine's packaging does not appeal to under 18's
The complaint was made in relation to rule 3.2 (h), that a drink’s name, its packaging and any promotional material or activity should not have a particular appeal to under-18s, though the ICP concluded this was not the case.
Made by a member of the public, the complainant stated: “The brand name BABE, has broad appeal to anyone who uses that nickname for friends or intimates.
“I bought the product on this basis (to gift to my wife) but I can see this may also appeal to under 18s in a similar way (for instance, a 17-year-old buying a small gift for a girlfriend).”
Social responsibility
ZX Ventures Limited, the producer of Babe, retorted it took its compliance under the Portman Group’s Code of Practice seriously and was committed to marketing its products in a socially responsible manner.
In its response, the company referenced the Oxford Dictionary’s description of the etymology which states the term ‘Babe’ was first used around 1915 to mean an attractive young woman and had been used as a romantic phrase since 1911.
The company explained it was not a recent slang phrase or derived from youth culture, but rather use of the term as an endearment nickname had been around for over 100 years and was used by friends and couples of all ages, for these reasons the company felt the product was fully compliant with the Code.
IPC noted both cans employed a limited colour palette which was muted, did not include any characters or cartoon-like illustrations, and the font used for the name and additional text was sharp and stark as opposed to childlike.
Unlikely to cause confusion
The drink’s alcoholic nature was also communicated with absolute clarity and was therefore unlikely to cause consumer confusion as to the adult nature of the product.
Independent Complaints Panel Chair Nicola Williams said: “Names matter, particularly when considered alongside other elements on packaging that emphasise and tell a brand story. In the case of the Babe wines, the products were adult in nature, and the overall appearance and messaging were not considered to have a particular appeal to under-18s.”
